# 9. Maupertuis' Principle: Minimum Action Path at Fixed Energy

### Divine Guidance

Incredibly, Maupertuis came up with a kind of principle of least action in 1747, long before the work of Lagrange and Hamilton. Maupertuis thought a body moved along a path such that the sum of products of mass, speed and displacement taken over time was minimized, and he saw that as the hand of God at work. This didn't go over well with his skeptical fellow countrymen, such as Voltaire, and in fact his formulation wasn't quite right, but history has given him partial credit, his name on a least action principle.

Suppose we are considering the motion of a particle moving
around in a plane from some initial point and time to some final . Suppose its potential
energy is a function of position, For
example, imagine aiming for the hole on a rather bumpy putting green, but also *requiring
that the ball take a definite time*, say two seconds, from being hit to
falling in the hole. The action principle we've talked about so far will give
the path, parameterized by time,

### It's Not About Time

But that's *not* what you're interested in doing! Of
course you want the ball to get in the hole, but you're not obsessed with how
long it takes to get there. Yet without that time requirement, there are
obviously many possible paths. If you hit it really fast, so its kinetic
energy is far greater than the gravitational potential energy variations in the
bumpy green, it will go close to a straight line (we're assuming that when it
gets over the hole, it will drop in). As you slow down, the winning path will
deviate from a straight line because of the uneven terrain. So the physical
path to the hole will vary continuously with initial kinetic energy.

**Maupertuis' principle is about what is the path to the hole, say from to, for a given initial
energy .**

So now we're fixing the beginning and end points in *space*,
but allowing possible variation in the final *time*. Also, we're *fixing
the energy*: This means
that in varying the path to minimize the action, we must restrict ourselves to
the class of paths having energy In
the bumpy putting green, you're giving the ball a fixed initial speed and trying different
initial directions to get it in the hole.

From the expression for the differential of action in terms
of varying the *endpoint* (as well as the rest of the path -- remember, that
gives the integral term that disappears along the dynamical path), we have all (the endpoint is fixed at
the hole), leaving

(Since we're restricting to paths with energycan be replaced by.)

### The Abbreviated Action

Writing the action in the integral form along this constant energy path, we can trivially do the time integral:

Therefore, from the result it necessarily follows that

is called the *abbreviated
action*: this is *Maupertuis' principle*.

The abbreviated action for the physical path is the minimum among all paths satisfying energy conservation with total energy and passing through the designated final point -- we don't care when. Note that not all values of will work -- for example, if we start putting the ball from a low point in the green, we'll need to give it enough energy to get out of the hollow to begin with. But there will be valid physical paths for a wide range of energy values, since the final arrival time is flexible.

Naturally, since this is a path through configuration space, to evaluate the abbreviated action

it must be expressed in terms of the For the usual Lagrangian with , and momenta

we find the abbreviated action

This is indeed an integral along a path in configuration space, but we need to get rid of the Physically, we can see how to do this -- since we know the total energy , the kinetic energy at a point is , so that determines the speed, hence the time to move by

That is, (following Landau)

,

from which

.

(This doesn't look like a very healthy mathematical object, but as you'll see, it's fine.)

Hence

To take a very simple case; if there is no potential, and just a free particle, this is nothing but the length of the path multiplied by , minimized by a straight line between the two points.

If we have a particle of massin a spatially varying potential , the abbreviated action reduces to

where is an element of path length. (This is obvious, really -- the square root is the absolute value of the momentum, and the momentum vector, of course, points along the path.)

The matrix , sometimes called the mass matrix, is evidently a metric, a measure in the configuration space, by which the "length" of the paths, and particularly the minimum action path, are measured.

*Exercise*: use Maupertuis' principle to find
the path of a cannonball, energy fired
at a target which ismeters distant
horizontally, both cannon and target being at sea level (think ships!).

### Maupertuis' Principle and the Time-Independent Schrodinger Equation

Recall that the action, multiplied by is equivalent to the
phase in quantum mechanics. The case we're discussing here is evidently
related to the time-*independent* Schrodinger equation, the one for an
energy eigenstate, with the time-dependent phase factored out. In other words,
imagine solving the time-independent Schrodinger equation for a particle in a
potential by summing over paths. In the classical limit, the abbreviated
action gives the total phase change along a path. Minimizing this to find the
classical path exactly parallels our earlier discussion of Fermat's principle
of least time, paths close to Maupertuis' minimum have total phase change along
them all the same to leading order, and so add coherently.

previous home next PDF